Tag: Addis Ababa administration

Regional Civil Servants Laws and Directives

Addis Ababa Administration

Addis Ababa Administration Civil servants Proclamation No. 6-2000 E.C. DOWNLOAD

የአዲስ አበባ ከተማ አስተዳደር የመንግሥት ሠራተኞች አዋጅ ቁጥር 6/2ዐዐዐ

Addis Ababa Administration Civil Servants Disciplinary and Grievance Procedure Directive DOWNLOAD

በአዲስ አበባ ከተማ አስተዳደር የመንግስት ሠራተኞች የዲሲፕሊንና የቅሬታ አቀራረብ አፈጻጸምና መመሪያ

Addis Ababa Administration Permanent Employees Recruitment Procedure Directive DOWNLOAD

የአዲስ አበባ ከተማ አስተዳደር የቋሚ መንግስት ሠራተኞች የቅጥር አፈጻጸም መመሪያ

Harari National Regional State

Harari National Regional State Civil Servants Proclamation No.34-1996 E.C.  DOWNLOAD

የሐረሪ ህዝብ ብሔራዊ ክልላዊ መንግስት የመንግስት ሰራተኞች አዋጅ ቁጥር 34-19996

Rights and  Benefits  of  Outgoing  Senior  Government Officials,  Members  of  Parliament  and  Judges  of the  Harari National  Regional  State Proclamation (Amendment) No. 93-2002 E.C.  DOWNLOAD

Amhara National Regional State

Proclamation No. 171 /2010  The Amhara National Regional State Civil  Servants  Revised Proclamation  DOWNLOAD

Regulation no.18.2004 the Civil Servants Screening Council of Regional government Regulation    DOWNLOAD

Regulation no.35.2005 the Civil Servants’ Screening Regulation Amendment DOWNLOAD

Rights and  Benefits  of  Outgoing  Senior  Government Officials,  Members  of  Parliament  and  Judges  of the  Amhara  National  Regional  State Proclamation No. 172/2010  DOWNLOAD

Amhara Natioal Regional State Revenue Authority Employees Administration Regulation DOWNLOAD

Amhara National Regional State Revenue Authority Employees Ethical Code of Conduct Directive No. 1-2003 E.C. DOWNLOAD

የአማራ ብሔራዊ ክልላዊ መንግስት የገቢዎች ባለስልጣን የስነ-ምግባር መመሪያ ቁጥር 1-2003

Amhara National Regional State Civil Servants Job Performance Evaluation Directive     DOWNLOAD

የአማራ ብሔራዊ ክልላዊ መንግስት የመንግስት ሰራተኞች የስራ አፈጻጸም ምዘና መመሪያ

Dire Dawa Administration

Dire Dawa Civil Servants Proclamation    DOWNLOAD

Dire Dawa Administration Job Grade Determination and Assignment for Sector Agencies and Kebele Administrations Implementing BPR    DOWNLOAD

በድሬዳዋ አስተዳደር መሰረታዊ የስራ ሂደት ለውጥ ጥናት ላካሄዱ የአስተዳደሩ ሴክተር መስሪያ ቤቶችና ቀበሌዎች ውስጥ የተፈፈቀዱ የስራ መደቦች የስራ ምደባና ደረጃ አወሳሰን አፈጻጸም መመሪያ

Some unusual facts about repeal in Ethiopia (Part III)

This is the last part of ‘some usual facts about repeal in Ethiopia.’  It discuses the power of the rime minister to repeal a law and the sudden action of parliament to repeal its ‘law-making law’

Power of the prime Minister to repeal a law

Article 74 of the F.D.R.E. Constitution grants wider powers to the prime minister of the country. Even though, the Constitution allows conferring more powers to the prime minister other than those indicated in article 74 by issuing a law to this effect, in practice almost all the proclamations that define the powers and duties of the executive organs, do not provide for additional powers. Usually there will be simply a reference to article 74 of the constitution.

“The  powers  and  duties  of  the  Prime  Minister  of  the  Federal  Democratic  Republic  of  Ethiopia shall  be  as  specified  under  Article  74  of  the Constitution.” [Article 3 of Proclamation No. 691/2010 Definition  of  Powers  and  Duties  of  the  Executive  Organs of  the  Federal  Democratic  Republic  of  Ethiopia  Proclamation]

My intention here is not to discuss the extent and scope of the power of the Prime Minister, rather to raise a question about his power of repealing a law. Does the Prime Minister have a power to repeal a law? Surely he does not have any power to repeal a law issued by the highest law making organ (The House of People’s Representatives.) What about regulations issued by the Council of Ministers and directives of administrative agencies? Looking at article 74 of the Constitution, it in no way provides such power to the prime minister. This similarly holds true for the laws of Addis Ababa Administration even though the administration is accountable to the federal government. On the other hand, the House of People’s Representatives is not constitutionally authorized to make a law empowering the prime minister to repeal a law.

Now, it is time to read article 3 sub article 3 of Proclamation No. 87/1997 (Addis Ababa City Government Charter Proclamation)

“The regulations, Directives and Decisions of the Addis Ababa City Government may be suspended or repealed by the Prime Minister of the Federal Government where they are deemed to be Prejudicial to the National Interest”

The scope of this provision seems to be limited to subordinate legislation, since it only mentions regulations and directives. Hence, it may be argued that the provision applies only to subsidiary legislation of the City Council. However, a brief look at some of the regulations issued by Addis Ababa administration, does not suggest that the term ‘regulation’ is used to refer to a law issued through delegation by a body subordinate to the city council. For instance the Addis Ababa City governmental information provision and standardization regulation number 34/2010 is issued by the City Council, which is the legislative organ of the administration. Even assuming that ‘regulation’ is a delegated legislation does not justify the power of the prime minister. The House of People’s Representatives by granting a repeal power to the prime minister clearly goes beyond the limits of its law making power as provided in the constitution.

The good news is that Addis Ababa City Government Charter Proclamation No. 87/1997 is totally repealed by the Addis Ababa City Government Revised Charter Proclamation No. 311/2003 (The repealing law is also repealed by the Addis Ababa City Government Revised Charter Proclamation No. 361/2003.) The current law which repealed previous legislations (Proclamation No. 361/2003) including subsequent amending proclamation (Proclamation No. 408/2004 Addis Ababa City Government Revised charter (Amendment) Proclamation) does not provide any power of repeal to the prime minister.

Parliament repealed its own ‘law-making’ law

Until 2006, the House of Peoples’ Representatives regulated its own legislative procedure by issuing a law (i.e. a proclamation) to this effect. All of a sudden it repealed its own ‘law-making’ law. The title of the repealing law is:

Proclamation No. 503/2006 The  Proclamation  to Repeal the  Amended Proclamation  of the House of  Peoples’  Representatives  Working  Procedure  and  Members’  Code of Conduct  Proclamation

Article 2 of the proclamation reads:

“[Article] 2 Repealed Laws

The  Amended  Proclamation  of  the  House  of  Peoples’  Representatives  working  procedures  and members’  code  of  conduct  proclamation  No. 470/2005 is hereby repealed in full.”

The first law enacted by parliament regulating the legislative procedure is Proclamation No. 14-1995 House of Peoples’ Representatives legislative Procedure Proclamation. After a year it was amended by Proclamation No. 33-1996 House of Peoples’ Representatives Legislative (Amendment) Proclamation. Both Proclamations were repealed by Proclamation No. 271/2002 House of Peoples’ Representatives Legislative Procedure, Committees Structure and Working Proclamation. The repealing law was again repealed by the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia House of Peoples’ Representatives Working Procedure and Members’ Code of Conduct (Amendment) Proclamation No. 470/2005. For the last time Proclamation No. 470/2005 is now ‘repealed in full’ by Proclamation No. 503-2006 (Repeal of the Amended HPR Working Procedure and Members Code of Conduct Proclamation)

So, why did parliament choose to abolish any law regulating the law making process? Actually, what parliament has done is substituting the proclamation governing the legislative procedure by its own internal regulations. In short, it decided that the legislative procedure should not be regulated by a proclamation published in the Negarit Gazeta, but by an internal regulation not accessible to the public. Be it a proclamation or a regulation, the contents of any legislative procedure will be adopted by a majority vote of the house. Practically, it seems it doesn’t make a difference. Yes it true, if it is a regulation it is not subject to the requirement of signature by the Nation’s President to be effective. It may also be said the regulation will be valid in the absence of publication in the Negarit Gazeta.

As indicated in the preamble of the repealing law, the sudden move by parliament seems to emanate from Article 59 sub article 2 of the constitution. The provision reads:

“The House shall adopt rules and procedures regarding the organization of its work and of its legislative process.”

It may be said that this provision of the constitution allows parliament to regulate the legislative procedure by its own internal regulations. However, this could not be submitted as a convincing ground justifying repeal of Proclamation No. 470/2005. Parliament is expected to provide a practical necessity or a goal to be achieved in choosing a regulation over a proclamation. The preamble part simply states ‘…it has become necessary…’ without providing a single instance of the necessity.

Here is the preamble part of Proclamation No. 503-1998

“WHEREAS,    the  House  is  expressly  provided  by Article  59(2)  of  the  constitution  of  the  Federal Democratic  Republic  of  Ethiopia  to  adopt  rules  and procedures  regarding  the  organization  of  its  work  and of its legislative process;

WHEREAS,  it  has  become  necessary  to  issue regulation  in  accordance  with  the  constitution regarding  the  working  procedures  of  the  House,  as practiced in other countries;

WHEREAS,  it  has  become  necessary  to  repeal  the Amended  proclamation  of  the  House  of  peoples’ Representatives  working  procedures  and  members’ code of conduct, and there by replace it by regulation”

If Article 59(2) of the constitution was the real justification, does it mean that the House of People’s Representatives was acting contrary to the constitution until the time it repealed Proclamation No. 470/2005? By the way I am so surprised by the fact it took more than 10 years for parliament to realize the existence of article 59 sub 2 of the constitution.

So, which regulation now regulates the legislative procedure? As I have said it before one of the problems of a regulation is its inaccessibility. Some lawyers may have knowledge that currently, the law making process of parliament is governed by regulation No. 3/2006 (The House of Peoples‟ Representatives of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Rules of Procedures and Members‟ Code of Conduct Regulation.) But I doubt whether they have access to it. Previously the regulation used to be on official web site of the HPR, now it could not be found.

I was lucky to get the English version of the regulation and you can also get it here.

Click HERE to read/download regulation No.3-2006